Last year has been a susprisingly bad year when it comes to… well, many things. The ripple effects from the pandemic reached the startup world, right after the peak of its artificial high. Like with big tech, layoffs seem to be abundant.
It’s a critical moment for many working in PR. Sales and other departments are the priority when it comes to staff budget, not PR. And, in terms of external agencies, PR agencies are often axed before performance marketing, for instance.
PR professionals and agencies that want to make the cut, and avoid getting cut, have to absolutely get their game on point and prove they are an asset for their company or client. We like to be joke-y and inject humour into these pet peeves blog posts, but it’s also an opportunity to discover the preferences of journalists and examples of where PRs have gone wrong.
The more you can delight journalists and add value for them, the more you will add value for your company. And the more you annoy them, the more you will help us with content for this blog series.
October
“Take a hint” dude. Six followup emails without getting a response is just asking for trouble (a.k.a. a PR pet peeve tweet).
Me when a PR email comes in with its fourth follow-up: Take a hint!
— Alex Kantrowitz (@Kantrowitz) October 4, 2022
Me trying to land an interview after five unanswered emails: *sends a sixth*
You nail the first step, but you also need to make sure you plan the second, third and other steps. Prepare to go through with the opportunity in its entirety (or prepare to fail).
PR: Do you want to talk to X about Y, in light of your reporting on Y?
— Olivia Solon (@oliviasolon) October 6, 2022
Me: Sure
PR: What do you want to talk about? Can you send questions ahead of time?
If you pitch a newsletter editor… make sure you are subscribed to that newsletter to check it. I mean, it’s pretty simple.
When you want to make it seem as if you have done your homework, but it’s such an incredibly bad effort that it just destroys your reputation with a contact.
PR: I loved your article about [something I've never written about]
— Haje (@Haje) October 11, 2022
Me: Sorry, which article?
PR: You know, on TechCrunch.
Me: Could you send me a link?
PR: That's not important. Can you cover this startup [in a field I don't cover]?#PRFail
Here is the perfect storm of what Haje (and most tech journalists) don’t care about. Now you can go and do the complete opposite.
Okay; now I think PRs are just trolling me. I just got a pitch for the perfect anti-thesis of what I cover; a no-name award by an unknown company awarded in an industry I don't care about — in a press release dated last week. A perfect storm of reasons to not cover this. #PRfail
— Haje (@Haje) October 12, 2022
Mind your grammar, said every journalist ever. Especially when it comes to the most important sentence in your pitch. P.S. we’d love to know what the last word was here.
" (name redacted to protect the innocent founder) raises €3.5 million euros for a bionic …"
— Dan Taylor (@sensorpunk) October 18, 2022
I don't ask for much, but a little proofreading here folks. Please.
This is a massive issue in our industry, and we don’t even feel like joking about this one. We are supposed to strengthen relations with the media, and somehow many end up turning into spammy email marketing machines. Don’t be one of those.
PR has a massive privacy issue. I stopped covering the tech beat 8+ months ago and have been responding to the low-quality scattershot email blasts with a formal request to remove my information – and they are all just going ignored.
— Dave Molloy (@davemolloy) October 19, 2022
Cate breaks it down for us: an interview is a conversation. Conversations will inevitably include spontaneous questions based on the progress of the conversation. Startup founders need to be OK with that.
Ryan Browne hit the tech PR absurdity jackpot with this one. There are countless sayings for this: walk the talk, practice what you preach, etc… when you do the complete opposite with a sensitive issue and hand it to a journalist on a silver platter, then maybe you should abandon all hope. We’re crying and laughing simultaneously as we type this.
Think we might have hit peak tech PR absurdity today – a comms person emailing in with a pitch on privacy and security, and they've only gone and cc'd a FLOOD of other journos on the same email. Just….. no words.
— Ryan Browne (@Ryan_Browne_) October 19, 2022
Asking for links is becoming a true source of spam for journalists who are just trying to do their jobs. Imagine someone constantly bugging you with something that is not important for your job role. Rob and others might block you, so think twice like Phil Collins!
Started instant blocking any PR or marketing person who asks me to link to their client's website in our coverage and it feels glorious
— Robert Scammell (@RobertScammell) October 20, 2022
Lots of clown emojis for another PR that didn’t want to let the journalist have a real conversation. It might have been an issue on the client’s side, but PRs need to educate their clients & bosses.
Read OOO auto-replies and check when the contacts are back. Then, remind yourself on your calendar, diary or somewhere of that contact returning to work. There, solved it for you!
Truly surprised by the number of people who emailed me more than once this week noting they had not heard back from me despite my OOO reply clearly stating I would be at Disrupt and mostly out of pocket.
— Mary Ann Azevedo (@bayareawriter) October 21, 2022
Do people just not read OOO replies anymore?
Newsflash, Sherlock! Not all journalists cover funding announcements!
Note: I'm probably not going to cover your company's funding announcement. Raising capital shows some level of success and is often a great detail to mention in a larger growth story, but the number alone does nothing for me unless there's a good story or lesson behind it.
— Brit Morse (@britnmorse) October 26, 2022
November
Guys, we’re supposed to connect our clients/bosses with the media, not replace them! The result is journalists increasingly becoming more proactive about bypassing or ignoring PRs, like Natasha Mascarenhas outlines here. Be an asset for the journalist, by being helpful in terms of what the journalist wants.
i am strongly considering only writing about companies if i can chat with the founder 1:1. i don't mind PR, i just don't think it's natural for conversations and it takes away from natural rapport
— natasha mascarenhas (@nmasc_) November 1, 2022
Do you use Google Docs or Word collaboratively? If so, make sure what you share with the media does not have any tracked changes or viewable history of changes. Ideally make a clean copy with view-only rights.
Don't submit content to me with tracked changes switched on. Don't do this. Please don't send me things with tracked changes turned on. Please stop, and I cannot stress this enough, sending me Word documents with tracked changes still active.
— Alex Scroxton (@alexscroxton) November 8, 2022
The “questions in advance” issue seems to have been in vogue in Q4 2022. As if PRs were wishing media relations would turn into some questionnaire-filling exercise. While written interview types of media opportunities exist, this is by far not the norm. So don’t expect it!
I feel like I shouldn't have to say this but just to make clear, a journalist should *never* be expected to provide questions in advance, whether it's an interview, panel, fireside, etc
— Ryan Browne (@Ryan_Browne_) November 9, 2022
If you want Zoe Kleinman to drink, send her a bad pitch (was that a PR pitch?).
Some journalists will be looking at sustainability more closely when it comes to covering startups. So do look out for that, especially those covering startups.
Dear PRs trying to sell me PropTech stories: I am literally NOT interested unless there is a climate / net zero angle. The built environment is a massive CO2 emitter. Please do your homework…
— Mike Butcher (@mikebutcher.bsky.social) (@mikebutcher) November 10, 2022
Is this a PR-specific pet peeve or just common sense? We must be at a historical low if this has to be tweeted. Berber Jin, we’re trying hard with these blog posts!
baseline expectation for PR folks is that they should have a good sense of a reporter's coverage/existing work before pitching anything or trying to set up meetings
— Berber Jin (@berber_jin1) November 11, 2022
Shortcuts make long delays. Getting on TechCrunch is delayed permanently for this PR.
lmfao that's the type of Monday energy i love to see in my inbox pic.twitter.com/em6rITP7u1
— Jacquelyn Melinek (@jacqmelinek) November 14, 2022
No one is safe from misspelled names, but journalists are more likely to get frustrated. Why? Because they don’t owe you anything, so you might as well take two seconds to spell their name right!
My biggest pet peeve is when people address me as Poojah or Puja in emails and DMs. The correct spelling is literally right there. Anyone else get annoyed by this?
— Pooja Shah (@PoojaShahwrites) November 16, 2022
Another one.
please don't pic.twitter.com/h1U5JgZeSP
— Bethany Dawson (@bethanymrd) November 17, 2022
Jim Pavia had a pretty bad experience with an exclusive that wasn’t an exclusive. As a result, a pet peeve condemning PR firms in general. How can the PR industry solve this PR problem? Pretty easy. If you are a PR and you are pitching an exclusive, make sure those working in your team are not simultaneously pitching exclusives. Or don’t offer it as such.
Now this: A PR rep pitched an op/ed and said it was exclusive to CNBC. We did edits and I pinged her with a pub time. She said colleagues sent the piece to another media outlet “unbeknownst” to her and it published. Wonder why my comfort level is so low when it comes to PR firms?
— Jim Pavia (@jimpavia) November 21, 2022
Pet peeve plus meme. Something went very wrong. So wrong, the PR actually knew they were doing the wrong thing. If it’s not what the journalist wants, don’t force it!
Top tip:
— Kate O'Flaherty (@KateOflaherty) November 22, 2022
Starting your pitch with "not exactly what you were looking for" when I said "the feature must answer these questions" is not the best way to start an email. pic.twitter.com/YyKqTgGXoF
We’re humble, and know when to learn a lesson. But we’re not masochists. We recognise the PR industry has a lot of flaws, but we categorically oppose such generalisations. Having said that (rant over), there’s a reason for these outbursts, and it’s that dodgy PR firms are disguising email marketing as PR. Don’t do email marketing disguised as PR!
The entire PR industry has become incredibly lazy. They all subscribe to huge databases of reporter emails and now they just spam email blast every press release. If you're a company thinking about hiring a PR firm, it's a huge waste of money.
— Simon Owens (@simonowens) November 30, 2022
December
Not sure if a prank or a bizarre pitch. Maybe both?
Iris loves PRs (thank you) and therefore gives us a useful tip: follow up less than you would, as journalists do read emails and will respond if interested.
PRs, I love you, but I do actually see every email. If you're following up more than twice, you're making it so much less likely that I'll respond to you.
— Iris Goldsztajn (@irisgoldsztajn) December 2, 2022
Responding to Iris with her own take, Johanna Read highlights the eternal PR-journalist conundrum. How to balance doing your job with reading emails from PRs. Why journalists don’t reply to every email. Why for some, even one followup is too much.
Dan Taylor shows us what most journalists appreciate – knowing things in advance. If you send something that is unfolding today, it has to be extremely interesting. Journalists love to get to the news, before they happen, so they can write about it, publish and spread it at the right exact moment.
In a move shocking no one, the end-of-year push is real. PR folks, if you're issuing statements that begin with "Today", I wish you the best of luck.
— Dan Taylor (@sensorpunk) December 7, 2022
Hayley from The Sun mentions the magic term that should be every PR’s God: newsworthiness.
Journalists get around 100 press releases a day, often more.
— Hayley Minn (@hayleyminn) December 8, 2022
If you want a reply, make sure your press release is an actual newsworthy story, has a (good) case study or celeb interview, is relevant to the journo you’re emailing, or take us out for lunch so we know who you are. https://t.co/CCRs5jUdhN
If you take the first step, make sure you are prepared to go all the way.
Low effort usually lead to low (or no) reward (or worse).
Impressed with this very low-effort PR email I received yesterday pic.twitter.com/DOGuDYknFq
— Simon Hunt (@SimonPeterHunt) December 16, 2022
What she says! Or, in other words, PRs, please equip your clients and founders to have a conversation with a journalist, and prepare them for a range of questions that journalists might have.
Want to learn even more? Check out some of our previous journalist pet peeves blog posts:
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: Q3 2022
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: Q2 2022
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: Q1 2022
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: Q2 2021
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: March 2021
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: February 2021
Journalist pet peeves on Twitter: January 2021